Case law research and summaries

A first summary in 30 seconds

Finding and summarising the decisions relevant to a case takes hours of reading in databases that are hard to use. Lawyers spend a disproportionate amount of time spotting useful precedents among thousands of decisions, at the expense of building their argument.

The automated workflow

A structured process for fast, reliable results.

Plain-language query

Phrase your search as a question (for example, “case law on abrupt termination of established commercial relationships”).

Semantic search

Case law databases are explored by meaning, beyond simple keywords.

Selection and ranking

The most relevant decisions are identified and ranked by relevance, date and court.

Structured summary

A usable summary with references, case law trends and key points.

Tangible results

÷10

Research time

30 s

To get a first summary

Sourced

Every point linked to its decision

Up and running in 4 to 5 weeks

From specification to deployment, with visible results from the first few weeks.

Rapid scoping (1 week)

Working prototype at the halfway point

Deployment and training included

Frequently asked questions: Case law research and summaries

The tool connects to public databases (Légifrance, the Court of Justice of the EU) and to your professional subscriptions (Dalloz, LexisNexis and others), depending on your configuration.

Yes, every point in the summary carries its exact reference (court, date, decision number) for checking and citation.

Yes, the tool covers every area: commercial law, employment law, company law, intellectual property and tax law, among others.

Evaluation studies published in 2026 measure high hallucination rates for general-purpose models applied to law. Our approach answers with systematic citation: every statement links to its source decision, checkable in one click, and the tool shows its level of confidence.

More workflows: Legal

-75% analysis time

Document due diligence

In M&A deals or audits, analysing hundreds of data room documents takes place under heavy time pressure. Benchmarks published by Kira Systems put the time saved on document review in mergers and acquisitions at 60 to 80%, as manual sampling is otherwise the only possible answer to high volumes.

4 to 6 weeks

Discover

-65% extraction time

Contract data extraction

Manually capturing key data from PDF or scanned contracts (dates, amounts, parties, specific clauses) to feed tracking spreadsheets ties up people on low-value work, with an error risk that grows with volume.

3 to 4 weeks

Discover

Compliance checked in minutes

Contract clause comparison

Checking clauses proposed by third parties against the company's mandatory standards means a point-by-point comparison on every incoming contract. This painstaking check monopolises lawyers, and its quality slips as soon as the flow picks up.

3 to 4 weeks

Discover

See all workflows: Legal