AI use cases/Portfolio Monitoring & LPs/Quarterly letter and investor documents
Portfolio Monitoring & LPs

Quarterly letter and investor documents

-70% time on the quarterly cycle

The quarterly cycle takes around sixty hours of an investor relations team's time: assembling reports specific to each LP, checking IRRs and multiples against the fund's accounts, capital account statements, then distribution tracked in a spreadsheet. The time between quarter close and delivery commonly reaches five working days, while institutional investors expect delivery within forty-eight hours. A single formula error spreads through every statement and costs credibility with the advisory committee.

Contact us

The automated workflow

A structured process for fast, reliable results.

01

Retrieving fund data

Consolidated portfolio figures and fund accounting data are retrieved, with every value linked to its source.

02

Calculating and checking metrics

IRRs, multiples and capital account statements are produced and reconciled with the accounting entries to rule out formula errors.

03

Writing the letter

The quarterly letter and portfolio company profiles are generated in your format, with performance commentary based on the variances observed.

04

Personalised distribution

Versions specific to each LP are produced in the expected format, with tracking of sends and acknowledgements.

Tangible results

-70%
Time spent on the quarterly cycle
Day 1
Delivery after quarter close, instead of day 5
100%
Figures linked to their accounting source

Up and running in 5 to 7 weeks

From specification to deployment, with visible results from the first few weeks.

Rapid scoping (1 week)
Working prototype at the halfway point
Deployment and training included

Frequently asked questions: Quarterly letter and investor documents

The ILPA reporting template version 2.0 has applied since the first quarter of 2026 to funds still in their investment period. The template sits alongside your historical format, so you can serve both while your LPs have different expectations.

Every published value keeps its link to its accounting origin, and reconciliation checks run before distribution. That traceability also makes it easier to answer the advisory committee's questions.

A first draft draws on budget variances and the quarter's highlights. The partner responsible for the company reviews and adjusts it: the commentary commits the fund, so human review remains the rule.

Document requests between publications, often around twenty a quarter, draw on the same base. You serve a figure already produced and checked rather than rebuilding it.

Ready to automate this workflow?

A free first call to assess the feasibility and ROI of this use case in your context.

Contact us

Go further: Our approach for private equity fundsBpifrance Data AI diagnosticProof of conceptOur offer