Contract analysis and review

-75% review time

Lawyers reread every contract by hand to spot risky clauses, inconsistencies and departures from internal standards. Bloomberg Law's 2024 analysis of contract workflows puts manual review at 92 minutes per standard commercial contract, against 22 minutes with an assisted first pass. That difference ties senior people to repetitive work where attention drops as volume rises.

The automated workflow

A structured process for fast, reliable results.

Contract ingestion

The document (PDF, Word, scanned) is imported into the analysis platform.

Key clause extraction

Important clauses are identified automatically: liability, termination, penalties, confidentiality.

Comparison with the playbook

Departures from standard clauses and the company's internal requirements are analysed.

Alert report

A structured report with points of attention, deviations and recommendations.

Tangible results

-75%

Contract review time

94 to 97%

Clause identification accuracy

22 min

Per contract, against 92 minutes manually

Up and running in 3 to 4 weeks

From specification to deployment, with visible results from the first few weeks.

Rapid scoping (1 week)

Working prototype at the halfway point

Deployment and training included

Frequently asked questions: Contract analysis and review

All types: commercial contracts, leases, employment contracts, partnership agreements, NDAs, terms and conditions of sale. The tool adapts to the structure and vocabulary of each type of document.

AI supports the lawyer by automating detection and comparison, while final approval stays with a person. The lawyer focuses on strategic analysis rather than mechanical rereading.

On standard clauses, industry benchmarks put accuracy between 94 and 97%. On unusual clause structures it falls to around 65 to 75%, which is why human review is kept on complex files.

Scanned documents go through OCR before analysis. Scan quality affects accuracy, and results stay high on reasonable scans.

Yes, processing takes place in a secure, GDPR-compliant environment. Your data is never used to train third-party models, and on-premise deployment is available.

More workflows: Legal

-80% collection time

Automated regulatory monitoring

Tracking legislative and regulatory change across many sources keeps legal teams busy collecting, sorting and summarising. The volume published each week exceeds the reading time available, and an important sector text can easily go unnoticed until it takes effect.

4 to 6 weeks

Discover

-60% drafting time

Drafting contract clauses

Drafting clauses suited to each context (contract type, jurisdiction, sector) ties senior lawyers to repetitive work. Keeping clauses consistent across the company is hard from one team to the next, and junior lawyers often work from incomplete reference templates.

3 to 4 weeks

Discover

A first summary in 30 seconds

Case law research and summaries

Finding and summarising the decisions relevant to a case takes hours of reading in databases that are hard to use. Lawyers spend a disproportionate amount of time spotting useful precedents among thousands of decisions, at the expense of building their argument.

4 to 5 weeks

Discover

See all workflows: Legal